In class this week we viewed Sony Pictures’ Inside Job, a documentary about the
systemic corruption within the United States’ financial system and how it
caused the 2008 market meltdown.
Over the course of the semester, it has become clear that
there were many factors, which caused the 2008 market meltdown. However, all of
the problems stem from an unregulated financial system. When Ronald Reagan took
over the presidency in 1980, he began a deregulatory policy that would continue
for 30 years. This policy created a “free-for-all” in the markets. Investment
banks bundled mortgages with other loans and debts into collateralized debt
obligations (CDO’s), which they sold to investors. In turn, commercial banks
began approving loans for anyone that wanted one because either way they were
getting paid. People also began investing heavily in over the counter
derivatives because they were advertised as a good investment, but in reality
they were incredibly toxic.
Isaac Newton’s laws of physics states every action, has an
equal and opposite reaction. Even though he used this law applies to physics,
it also explains how the financial markets function. Whenever the market heads
positively in one direction, it eventually will peak and head equally in the
opposite direction.
In 2008, the financial market kept with this trend by
correcting itself. However, since the economy had grown so positively large that
when it peaked and headed in the negative direction, it had an enormous
negative effect. There were some people, like Brooksley Born, who predicted
this detrimental market correction and attempted to stunt it. Born discovered how
toxic over the counter derivatives were and moved to regulate them. Unfortunately, Alan Greenspan and others
on his team were adamant about keeping the markets unregulated and blocked
every attempt Born made to regulate any part of Wall Street. If we want to
avoid another financial crisis like this in the future, we need to regulate the
markets.
The phrase “too big to fail” applies to the
interconnectedness of the investment and commercial banks on a global level. It
means that these banks have grown so large that if they fail, they will stall
the global economy and therefore the government is forced to bail they out. This
is an unsafe public policy, especially without any type of regulation, because then
the banks have no moral standard to live up to. Banks can assume that if they’re
large enough, it does not matter how many mistakes they make since the
government will bail them out if they get into trouble. Policy makers should
really look into an effective way to regulate the financial market.
Derivatives played a huge role in the financial crisis of
2008. They are a good example of excessive, over-speculation that needs to be
regulated. Investment bankers and investors alike did not fully understand
their complexity and sold them off as a sure thing when in reality, they were
incredibly toxic.
In theory an
unregulated market makes sense, but unfortunately when you add in human emotion
the system falls apart. As we have seen through readings, this video and other
videos we’ve viewed throughout the semester, investors become easily blinded by
greed and therefore overlook potential problems within the system. They also
neglect to share information in order to get ahead of others which is why it is
necessary for the government to enact some form of regulation.
Good Job ! Mark Tatge, http://www.bizreporting.com
ReplyDelete